Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE SYDNEY DIVORCE CASE.

Tub sensational divorce ca^e in Sydney of Coningham against Coi.injrh m\. 1:1 which the Very Rev. Dr. O'Haran was named aa co-respondent, after lasting several days came to an unsatisfactory termination on Friday last, the jury being unable to agree, and both partita being unwilling to accept a majority verdict. The case was tried but ore a judge and jury, all of the latter being non-Catholioe. Our Sydney correspondent informs us that eight of the jurors were in favor of giving a verdict for the co-respondent for whom universal sympathy is felt.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZT19001220.2.51

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXVIII, Issue 51, 20 December 1900, Page 20

Word count
Tapeke kupu
96

THE SYDNEY DIVORCE CASE. New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXVIII, Issue 51, 20 December 1900, Page 20

THE SYDNEY DIVORCE CASE. New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXVIII, Issue 51, 20 December 1900, Page 20

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert