Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY REFORM. SOME GLARING WRONGS.

TO THK KniTOR. Sm,--I wish to direct the attention of your readers to one or two points in the working of our railways which require immcdMte attention. In my cross-examination of Mr Maxwell— see report, pages 50 and 3(>— l clearly brought out the fact that the " cost of service" is greatly less on the Auckland and Napier lines than it is on the HurunuiBlutf sections. I asked how, under these circumstances, the heavy differential rating against Auckland and Napier could be justified. After a great deal of fencing and pvasion, Mr Mavwell was compelled to admit that the only reason was to get revenue. This is how the matter stands : The cost of moving one ton a mile was in

Thus it will bii «een that the cost of in iving ;< ton on a train a milo is considerably le-* m X.tpier and Auckland than it is in thi> South Island, and yet heavy differential rates tiro imposed against us. I now wi-.li to c.ill attention to what I consider a far ir.oro important matter, not only as regards the interests of country settlers, but as regards the welfare of the whole community. On pnge 20 of the " minute*" will be found a return of the passenger traffic on the Hurumu-Jjliilf section for the year ISS4-5. This return shows that the 7-53.222, who»o necessities compelled them to tnwel distances of over 10 miles, contributed £177,-">11 to the revenue, while the 1,1(52,87"), who required to travel only 10 miles and under, contubnted but £47, 133. On page 80 is a .-similar return for the Auckland lines. From this it will be seen that 131,%4 who travelled over 10 miles paid £30,313, while the 2f12,94() who tr welled under 10 miles only paid £",.")%. This appears to me. to be a very unf.iit adjustment of the burden, and when we lemember that the same rule applies to goods traffic, we need not go further to find a cause for all out commercial trouble*, and many of our social ones too. — I am, &c, Samukl Vaii.e. Auckland, 2Ut August, 188(5.

Napier . . Viicklaiid 'iiirunui-]! Mul If" 1884-5 4(5 '92 51 -01 .->f1.75 1885-0. 4515 48-34 5671

These figures aru given in pence per mile. The cost of running a train a mil© was in pence ocr mile :—: —

s T apier Vncklanrl . j..« ,: i»i.,cf 213 2 43 O-.17 2"]. "5 2 24

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18860824.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2204, 24 August 1886, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
402

RAILWAY REFORM. SOME GLARING WRONGS. Waikato Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2204, 24 August 1886, Page 2

RAILWAY REFORM. SOME GLARING WRONGS. Waikato Times, Volume XXVII, Issue 2204, 24 August 1886, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert