THE NATIVE EJECTION CASE.
The hearing of this case was resumed at Cambridge yesterday, before the Resident Magistrate (Mr Northcroft), and Mr Wells, J.P., Mr W. M. Hay appearing for the prosecution and Mr E. Hesketh for the defence. The only witness examined was a native woman named Ani Whata, who deposed that the land occupied by the natives had not been purchased by Mr Walker, although offered to him. She was living on it because Mr Walker had not paid the rent for the lease. She also deposed to the particulars of the alleged assault. Considerable time was consumed in discussing the matter of interpreting the evidence. The witness said she did not understand what the interpreter, Mr Tizard, said, and counsel strongly urged the Court to take measures for providing two efficient interpreters. The Magistrate said lie had no' power, and counsel eventually telegiapliod to the Minister of Justice, laying tiie matter before him, but received no roply yesterday. Two interpreters were, however, temporarily engaged and the case proceeded. On the conclusion of the examination of the witness Ani Whata, the case was adjourned till 10 a.m. to-day.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18830104.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1638, 4 January 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
190THE NATIVE EJECTION CASE. Waikato Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1638, 4 January 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.