Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE COURT.

HAMILTON.— Tub;dat, Deo. 23. [Before H. W. Northcroft, Esq., R.M.] John Dwier, William Mays, and George Mays, juhr., were charged with a breach of the Vagrant Act Amendment Act, by having 1 behaved m a disorderly manner i» a public place— to wit, the Railway Hotel, at Frankton, near Hamilton, whereby a breach of the peace was occasioned. Mr O'Neill (solicitor) appeared for the defendants, and pleaded guilty. Sergeant McGovern said the case was a bad one, the defendants having behaved m a most disgraceful manner. His Worship said he saw by the chargesheet that there was a second charge entered against the defendants— that of malicious injury to property to the extent of £5. He should hear the second charge before giving his decision on the first. To this charge Mr O'Neill also pleaded guilty. Sergeant McGovern said the defendants were m the Railway Hotel on the night m question, and at closing-up time Mr James, the proprietor, directed them to leave, when the defendants turned round on him, made use of filthy language, broke, his doors and windows, and assaulted Mm. > His Worship: Do the defendants reside m Hamilton P Sergeant McGovern: Yes. The two Mays have been residing here for some sixteen years past, and Dwier about eight months. His Worship : And character have they borne P Sergeant McGovern : Very good'; ,this is their first offence. In reply to the Court, as to whether they had anything to say, defendants replied "No." His Worship then gave the defendants a severe leoture, and said -if it were not for their youth, and the statement of the Sergeant that their conduct has hitherto been good, he would not have given them the option of • a fine m the second charge, but would have committed them to prison. On the fir3t charge he would fine John Dwier and William Mays m the sum of 40s and costs each, and George Mays 20s and coats, m default one month's imprisonment. On the second charge he would fine each of them 10s and costs, and to pay damages £5, m default one month's imprisonment.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18791225.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XIII, Issue 1170, 25 December 1879, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
354

POLICE COURT. Waikato Times, Volume XIII, Issue 1170, 25 December 1879, Page 2

POLICE COURT. Waikato Times, Volume XIII, Issue 1170, 25 December 1879, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert