Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT.

I Hamilton, June 10. \ (Before H. W. Northcroft, Esq., R.M.) James Kednedy was charged with a breach of Clause 158 of the Public Works Act, 1876, Subsection 4, by being drank on the i railway at Hamilton. Prisoner pleaded guilty, and was fined Ids; costs, 14s. DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. William Cockhead, Jesse Cockhead, and William" Murphy were charged, with wilfully and maliciously pulling up the boards of a floor and doing other damage to property belonging «to Mr A. Potter, of Hamilton. , v Prisoners pleaded not guilty. Albert. Potter, being sworn, said : On Thursday last I. found that the lock of* my slaughteryard had been injured. On the next day I found that a slab had been, removed by being wrenched away. I saw three boys run away from the place. I cannot say that these boys really did the damage. Case dismissed. ' CIVIL SIDE. Coates & Campbell v. Brown. — Claim for debt, £5 19s lOd. Mr Hay appeared for plaintiffs, and statod that the amount had been paid but claimed judgment for costs. Judgment given for plaintiffs' costs, £1 11s 6d. In the following undefended cases, judgment was given for plaintiffs with costs : — Frew v. Arekatera, £2 7s; Mssen v. Smyth, £2 2s; Vialpu v. Ansell, £22 17s; Potter 7. G. Elelly, £1 8s 7d. DEFENDED CASES. Teas v. Mason.— Olaitn for 1.0.TJ. of .£9. Mr Hay for plaintiff; Mr O'Neill for defendant.R. B. Mason, sworn, said : lam a laborer residing at Hamilton. The document produced bears my signature. Samuel Teas, sworn, said : I am a farmer residing at East Hamilton. On the 25th of January defendant signed the 1.0. U. now sued for, m purchase of fruit. On several occasions he promised to pay instalments. Cross-examined by Mn O'Neill : The 1.0. U. was signed on a Sunday, but drawn out on the Saturday. Nonsuited with costs, £1 9s. Potter v. Beere.— Claim £2. Mr O'Neill for defendant. Plaintiff deposed to .sending the goods. Walter Potter deposed to taking the bill to the mill. Defendant said he did not think he owed the money, bufc would ask his men. Ch B. Beere, s ;vorn, said : He was m the habit of dealing with the plaintiff for meat, but had settled up m September last, and gave particular, instructions to his family not to bring any more meat from Mr Potter's. Judgment for amonnt and costs, 7s 6d.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18790612.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XIII, Issue 1087, 12 June 1879, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
400

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Waikato Times, Volume XIII, Issue 1087, 12 June 1879, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Waikato Times, Volume XIII, Issue 1087, 12 June 1879, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert