RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT.
Friday, August 5. (Before Charles Broad, Esq., R.M.) CIVIL CASES. London v. Christenson.—Claim for £4 5s 3d. The sum of £1 7s 61 had been paid into Court by the defendant, who pleaded not indebted as to the remainder. The amount objected to, £2 17s 9d, it was contended had been paid. Plaintiff stated that goods had been supplied to Christenson and Hopkins, who lived together, to the amount, of £5 7s 9d. Had sued Hopkins for his share a few months back, and the balance due by Christenson was now being sued for. The defendant cross-examined, and produced a bill receipted. Plaintiff denied that the bill produced was a correct one. His Worship-ruled that the plaintiff should have either sued the parties jointly, or have elected one for the full amount. Plaintiff was nonsuited.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18700806.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 694, 6 August 1870, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
138RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 694, 6 August 1870, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in