Assessment Court for the Wairarapa North County
MASTERTON-FRIDAY. (Before Mr T. Hutchison, S.M.) MASTERTON ROAD DISTRICT. W. B. Buick.-Value £7337. Objection: value does not exceed £6693. Mr Pownall for objector. Valuation sustained. John McLachlan. Objection: valuation excessive. Reduced by consont of valuer, 2s fid per acre. H. and A. Welch.-Area reducod by 10 acres, and value by £4O on tho application of the assessor. James Wrigloy.—Acreage increased to 1755 acres 2 roods 2 poles Valuation at £3857. Suataiued. MAORICKVIU.E ROAD DISTRICT, I Catherine Carroll.—Objection: valuation £350 is excessivo, and doeß notexceed£2oo.Noappearancc. Valuation sustained. EKETAHUNAROAD DISTRICT. W. R. Cousius,—Objection: value excessive. No appoarauce, Valuation sustained. Carl Schnell.- Value £592. Objection: excessivo. Value does notoxceed £SOO. No appearance. Valuation sustained. W. Candy .-Mrs E. A. Caffrey's name substituted for that of objector by consent. L. C. Christensen—Valuationoxcessive. No appearance. Dismissed. H. Schormann - Part Section 51, Block X, Mangaone: Valuation reduced to £420. Section 54, ditto, reduced to £353. ALFRKDTON OUTLVINO DISTRICT. 6. W, Phillips.—Objection: valuation excessive. No appearauco, Valuation sustained, UPPKR TABERU ROAD DISTRICT. JamcsMiller—Acreage setdown as 2845. Objector says the road allowanco should bo takeu off, leaving 2740 acres. Decision: That the road actually taken, be deducted from the 2845 acres. As to valuation, reduced Is per acre. Total reduction, £142. M. 6. Hammond. Valuation reduced by consent to £1478. W. A. Cameron.—Objection to both acreage and value. No appearance. Acreage reduced to 1800. Valuation to £2150, Owners name altered to " Natives." Taiawbio Te Tau to be notified. AKITIO ROAD DISTRICT. C. W. Brodie,—Objection: road allowance should be deducted. Valuation and acreage sustained, No appearance. WHARKAMA OUTLYING DISTRICT, E. Meredith-Valuation of Trust property, £3000; claims reduction of £SOO. Decision reserved. CAS'IUPOINT ROAD DISTRICT. It, ayd F. Maunsoll—Objection t» valuation, Claim, reduction of £2OOO. Reduced by consent by £IOOO. W.F.C.A.—Reduced by consent £IOO. i
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18950405.2.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4994, 5 April 1895, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
302Assessment Court for the Wairarapa North County Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4994, 5 April 1895, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in