CORRESPONDENCE
FREEZING WORKS DISPUTE (To the Editor). Sir, —Will you permit me to correct a paragraph in an article in your issue of Thursday in regard to the freezing workers’ dispute. lam reported as saying that tho companies should not have consented to a conference. What 1 did say was that three other farm ers’ representatives and myself held the view that we should not offer to apply to the Court for a new award, as tho old one had still seven months to run. The freezing companies con ■ sidored that no good purpose would be served in having a conference, and in that, opinion all the farmers’ representatives concurred. —I am, eV-.. W. MORRISON. Maxwelltown, December 10, 1926.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19261211.2.33
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 19721, 11 December 1926, Page 6
Word Count
119CORRESPONDENCE Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 19721, 11 December 1926, Page 6
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Wanganui Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in