Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LIABLE TO BE SUED

THE STATE ADVANCES CORPORATION NOT ENTITLED TO CROWN PRIVILEGES. SUPREME COURT RULING. (By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, July 31. After hearing argument submitted to him by counsel in the Supreme Court. Mr Justice Fair has decided that the State Advances Corporation must be considered a separate and distinct entity, and that it is not to be identified with, and entitled to privileges of, the Crown; The judgment is of great interest to contractors and workers engaged in the erection of State houses, in that it decides that the State Advances Corporation, while engaged in the erection of State houses, is subject to the provisions of the Wages Protection and Contractors’ Liens Act, 1908, so that a charge may be secured upon contract moneys in the same manner as if the houses were being built for an individual owner. An action claiming a charge on moneys payable to a contractor under the State housing scheme was brought by Smith and Smith, Limited, merchants, Winstone Limited. Henderson and Pollard. Limited, and N. J. McLeod and the trustees of the William Peet Estate against the State Advances Corporation and O. A. Smith, builder. It was urged for the State Advances Corporation that the corporation was the Crown and was consequently not bound by the provisions of the Wages Protection Act. Cn behalf of claimants, it was urged that the corporation was not the Crown or the agent of the Crown, and was, consequently, bound by the Act, as if it were an individual owner. In giving judgment, his Honour said he had been disposed to think, on hearing counsel’s argument, that the State Advances Corporation was alter ego of the Crown and was entitled to the immunities and privileges that I 'the Crown had granted to it. by common law and by statute. But further consideration of authorities cited, his Honour continued, had led him to the conclusion that he was obliged to hold, in this case .that the provisions of the State Advances Corporation Act. 193 G. amounted to a declaration that the corporation was intended to exist as a separate entity from the Crown in its general capacity, and was entitled to sue and liable to be sued in such independent capacity.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAITA19390801.2.106

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1939, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

LIABLE TO BE SUED Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1939, Page 9

LIABLE TO BE SUED Wairarapa Times-Age, 1 August 1939, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert