Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IN THE SAME BOX.

The Otago Daily Times wants to know why Sir James Carroll, when telling his audience at Invercargill that Mr iviassey had voted against tlie Advances to Settlers Bill, did not mention that Mr Thomas Mackenzie and Mr J. A. Millar had also opposed that measure. "Is it not apparent," it asks,. "that if Mr Massey, by the opposition he offered to that Bill, for the same reasons as were urged by Mr J. A. Millar in explanation of his opposition.—namely, that he was pledged to oppose further borrowing—showed himself to be not entitled to the confidence of the electors as a member of the Government, Mr Thomas Mackenzie and Mr Millar are in precisely the same case?"

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19110712.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10284, 12 July 1911, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
121

IN THE SAME BOX. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10284, 12 July 1911, Page 4

IN THE SAME BOX. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10284, 12 July 1911, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert