Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NAVAL NEEDS.

BRITAIN'S PERILOUS POSITION. SPEECH BY LORD ESHER. United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph Copyright, Received June 2, 8.10 a.m. LONDON, June 1. s Lord Esher, a member of the Committee of Imperial Defence, in the course of a speech at Callander, in Perthshire, declared that Britain stood in a more perilous position today than at any time during the last 100 years. Britain, said his Lordship, ought to build two warships -to every one of the next strongest European Power.

Anything that Lord Charles Beresford has to say on the navy is interesting. The London "Daily Mail" in its issue of April 22nd, contains an interview with him, and it is important, as showing that he places the navy far above party politics. "Let it be distinctly understood," he said, "that this is not a party question. I am a. strong party man myself. a n .d 6n party political questions am prepared to give and receive som? hard knocks; but the question of the navy and the security of the country is of more importance than theskirmishes df rival politicians." He>as specially anxious that neither party should make political capital out of the dematid for increased armaments, or, in f?ct, any demand for jiaval organisation or the stiffening of otu* first line cf defence. "What sehß^'-'h e asked, is there in working up d panic»° As a , m . a , tter of fact, there is no panicV & n(1 * . ere will be no panic if fussy poHUeinJ l3 and hustling journalises will only USB a little restraint a'hd some common* sense. It is nonsgmtfe to talk of a j scare. We can strengthen our navy without becoming cowards. And because I demand a strong navy i there is no reason why I should become a scaremonger. I fight Socialists and Radicals and Liberals as political opponents, but even a Socialist would not like to see Piccadilly swept by a troop of invad- j ers We can fight our political battles as hard as you please. My policy on domestic questions may be all wrong and yours may be all right, but if I believe I am right I will fight hard to eive effect to my views, and my opponent must do the same, and we shall both be all the better for the little ruffle." But the question of the navy and Imperial defence, he went on to say, was in another category. In regard to that question there ought to.be a strong national opinion without the least suspicion of party bias.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090603.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 3205, 3 June 1909, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
423

NAVAL NEEDS. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 3205, 3 June 1909, Page 5

NAVAL NEEDS. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 3205, 3 June 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert