TRIAL OF DINIZULU.
A DIFFERENCE O? OPINION. Received January 31, 8.33 a.m. LONDON, January 30. The Blue Book on the rising in Natal shows that there was a divergence of opinion between Lord Elgin, Secretary for the Colonies, and the Government of Natal, regarding the measures to suppress the rising. In a despatch, dated the 21st, the Colonial Government desired to make it clear that it was never intended to try Dinizulu by court-martial, or otherwise than under the Criminal Procedure Act.
MANGATI'S TESTIMONY. DINIZULI INSTIGATED ALL THE MURDERS. Received January 31, 9.30 p.m. DURBAN, January 31. At the trial of Dinizul.i, the chief Mangati, who was, yesterday, sentenced to five years' imprisonment for public violence, testified that Dinizuli instigated Bambaata to rebel, premising that if all the Natal tribes joined he would come to their assistance. The witness said that he believed Dinizuli instigated all the murders during and after the rebellion. A warrant, charging him with murder, has been served on Dinizuli.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19080201.2.16.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXI, Issue 9044, 1 February 1908, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
164TRIAL OF DINIZULU. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXI, Issue 9044, 1 February 1908, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in