Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Monday, 24th June. (Before Vincent Pyke, Esq., R.M.)

Oiidaille v. Campbell. — Summons not served. Adjourned for fourteen days.

Sams v. King. — Claim, £25 11s., amount of dishonoured acceptance. The defendant stated that he was under the impression that Harris was charging him with 20s. interest per month. There being no evidence to show that such was the case, judgment was given for tho amount claimed, with costs.

Martin v. Coverlid. — Claim for £1, amount due for four dozen soda water bottles taken by defendant from plaintiffs residence. Mr. M'Uoy appeared for plaintiff. Defendant said he had seen some bottles at plaintiff's residence, which he believed were his. He made enquiry after pbiintiff, but could not find him. lie then took possession of the bottles. Plaintiff said he had collected the bottles found at his house at Waipori, and Waitahuna, from hedges, ditches, and waysides. He found that plaintiff had taken them, and he charged him os. per dozen as the price of bottles had risen in Duneliu. On being cross examined by defendant, plaintiff could not tell how many he got at Waipori or at Waitahu la, but said he never took any bottles from hotels. H. Robinson stated that bottles like those in dispute (soda water) were imported to the district some nine or ten years ago. In addressing the Bench, Mr. Coverlid stated I hat for years he was the only terated water manufacturer in the district; that every year it cost him £30 for bottles; and the price in Dunedin was 2s. 3d. per dozen by the gross. He was satisfied the bottles were his, as he fixed the wire different from any other manufacturer. The Magistrate stated that the course the defendant took in removing the bottles had taken the ground from under his feet. If he thought the bottles were his, he ought to have taken the proper steps. He considered, however, that the price was too high, and would give judgment only for 3s. per dozen, and costs of court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18720627.2.31

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume V, Issue 230, 27 June 1872, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
336

Monday, 24th June. (Before Vincent Pyke, Esq., R.M.) Tuapeka Times, Volume V, Issue 230, 27 June 1872, Page 7

Monday, 24th June. (Before Vincent Pyke, Esq., R.M.) Tuapeka Times, Volume V, Issue 230, 27 June 1872, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert