Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THIS DAY,

(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., R.M.)

Frederick Wells was charged with killing a pig on his premises, Owen street, such premises not being duly licensed. The defendant stated that he had to kill the pig without loss of time, as it was suffering, and upon opening it, he found a bone in its throat. Fined Is.

CIVIL SIDE. Judgment foe Plaintiffs. Veale v. Bradley .—Claim, £18 6s; costs £1 9s 6d.

Wight v. Fisher.-—Claim, £1 13s; costs 7s.

Same v. Perkins.—Claim 4s for a bushel of maize which the plaintiff alleged was spilt from the defendant's dray through, careless stacking. Same v. Latham.—Claim, 15s 2ri ; costs 7s.

Same v. Tooher.—Claim, £3 Is 4d; costs 7s.

Same v. Lanham.—Claim, £116s; costs 7s.

Phillips and Son v. Bradley.—Claim, £10 3d lid; costs £219s 6d.

Same v. Stanley.—Claim, £3 Is; cost, 7s.

Mason v Curnow —Claim, £6125; costs, 11s.

Casey v Heron. —Claim, £7 12s 4d; costs, 11s.

Me Williams v Hauraki Gold Mining Company.—Claim, £8 11s for work done. Mr Miller appeared for the plaintiff, The manager of the company admitted that the work had been done, but pleaded that the plantiff had been paid for it. After hearing the evidence of the legal mine managers as to payments made to Me Williams, Mr Miller applied for leave to amend his particulars. The Bench nonsuited the plaintiff, and allowed the defendants £4 17s costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18830511.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4477, 11 May 1883, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
236

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4477, 11 May 1883, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4477, 11 May 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert