WARDEN'S COURT.
Monday.
(Before H. Keir/.ck, Esq., R.M.) JOHN BLAIN V. A. MOORE AND OTHES9.
This was an application for the forfeiture of the Hose of Denmark claim on the ground of non-working. Only two of the defendants appeared, viz., Carrick and Bramby. The others had practically abandoned the claim, having taken up ground elsewhere.
John Blain proved that the defendants had not bren on the ground sirce the 23rd December, except Oarrick, who was on the ground last Wednesday. Gedleigh and other shareholders were working at Ruakaka.
The defendants who appe .red, Bramby and Carrick, deposed that they had worked in the claim siqce the holidays. His Worship awarded the ground to plaintiff, acd gave Carrick and Bramby their shares, ordering them to pay the costs (11s) between them. This was all the business.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18810112.2.15.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3757, 12 January 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
135WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3757, 12 January 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in