DISTRICT COURT.
THIS DAY.
[Before J. B. 'Mscdonald, E«q., District Judge.)
(HELLION V. TAIPAII.
This was a claim for £97 damages for that defendant employed plaintiff to sell £258 worth of Insurance shares which he did sell, but defendant afterwards refused to transfer.. Plaintiff then replaced the shares at a higher figure, and now sued for the difference in price. Mr Brassey' appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Miller for the defendant.
Mr Miller at once raised the question of jurisdiction. - His Honor upheld the objection, pointing out to the plaintiff's solicitor that the very same objection had been raised'by himself on a previott occasion, when acting for a defendant in an action, and had then been upheld by. the Court.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18801102.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3699, 2 November 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
121DISTRICT COURT. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3699, 2 November 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.