Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A New Zealand Actor in Trouble.

Inglis v. Ingiis.

The maiuiege of the petitioner and respondent, who were both young at the time, was solemnised at the St. Peucras New Church in Seplembe, 1863. Very shortly after their union the respondent, who was a clerk in the Bail way Clearing House, was guilty of personal violence towards bis wife, and he oj several occasions beat their infant child, a daughter only two months old, in her presence. On one occasion he held the child by its f;et, aud, swinging it round, threw it with violence on the sofa, and, fearing for its life, the petitioner placed it for protection under the charge of its grandmother. She herself had to leaved fiiiniu consequence of his continued, illtreatment, in November, 1864, and in the following year he went ' j Australia. After a brief slay in the coleny he returned to England, and some time afterwards he left ibis country for .New Zealrnd, where he joined the stage, aud acbievi. 1, it was said, considerable success and reputation as an actor. Tae last communication which his wife received from him was in 1868. In 1870 she heard that he was living at Dunedin or Otago, in New Zealand, with\a womnu who passed as his wife,' and with 'whom there was reason, it was sa; d, to suppose be had gone through a ceremony of marriage. The copy of the petition and citatio i in the suit were served upon him at Otago, in 1875, but, owing to the death of her then solicitor, who had taken up her cause out of sympathy, and want of means, the petitioner was unable to continue her suit until last year, when a commission was sent out to New Zealand, and evidence taken under it establishing the charge of adultery alleged in the petition against the respondent. " The cruelty with which he was also charged was likewise proved, and on these grounds, and on the prayer of the petitioner, the Court pronounced a decree nisi with costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800705.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3595, 5 July 1880, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
340

A New Zealand Actor in Trouble. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3595, 5 July 1880, Page 2

A New Zealand Actor in Trouble. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3595, 5 July 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert