WARDEN'S COURT.
' (Before ■Wv'Pijftraf'Esq.,*Warden.) ■ GOLDSMITH V.MUBDOCK. : This .wai..an. action Jbrought by the Inspector toif jUibeS^ cibr - iencroaching upon the Tararu .Koad, a breach of 72nd sebK6n of ihe /Eegulaiions of *the Goldmining District Act. ■ Defendant said he had shifted his fence j 3§ feet back after he had received notice from Captain Goldsmith. -« ? i Mr Burgess, Clerk to the Mining Registrar, produced a plan of the original, certificate showing surrey of Murdoch's allotment. . , , The yTarden ordered defendant, to remdTejthe iFerice within 14 days, arid im-.. posea a mitigated penalty of Is and 'costs; failing this a fine of £5 to beimposeJ. , , , ■' SAME ri. JAMES CAMPBELL. This was a similar action for encroachment upon the Tararu Road. The defendant admitted the offence, and .there was no evidence called, a similar fine as in the last case being imposed, with the like conditions. The Court then adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18741222.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume VI, Issue 1863, 22 December 1874, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume VI, Issue 1863, 22 December 1874, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in