MR EDGELER ON HIS DEFENCE.

Temuka Leader, Issue 1149, 11 March 1884, Page 3

MR EDGELER ON HIS DEFENCE.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir— Your article of the Forth Reminds Me of a friend of mine years ago be wass a Quaker or one of the Society of friends he would say we and the or we and thy But you are not half Quaker you are all we we we Predicted and we Pointed out and we told them and we was# right Now Mr Editor we wass not right in Mixing Mr Edgeier Name With the Proposed Borough or against it Mr Edgeier wass to Insignificant a Person to be Consulted and Mr Editor you are in Error again in saying Mr Edgeier whants to keep Both townships Separate I suppose Mr Edgeier Can take what meanes he Chuse to Bring a Bout what we we Could not be it ever so Charming as to What the People of temuka will appear in the eyes of the Colonial Secretary old weman or not we we will not be in it and Mr Editor it is verrey kind of we not to be opposed to the union of the townshipps and Mr Editor it is verrey considrate of we to Show the town People of temuka what Ridicculous dupa they have Brought themselves to be By Being Led by So Charming u Leader and Mr Editor I Cannot Concave how we we can get the town Proclamed when you say that they will not take any Notice of we and Mr Editor I se we have have have taken 48

hours to Show Mr Edgeler up Now Mr Editor Mr Edgeler bass not Changed is mind from first to Last alow Me Mr Editor to remind you that the doctors do not give the same medicine for every Complaint you Can Remember what I said about Wellenton But not that I said I would wake them up and stir them up and Mr Edito Because I have done this lam not to go Wellenton I am So Flagrant if my going to Wellenton depends on your exaggeration in your Reports of What I have Said at the meetings I shall be going around Capehorn Insted of Waeileton yours truly George Edgeler, T.P.M.O. [Now, this is really provoking. Here is Mr Edgeler, with a fresh batch of capital letters after bis name, trying to drag us into an argument around Cape Horn. And he begrudges us the use of the Royal plural, too. It is too bad—too bad. We trust our correspondent will not again trouble us unless he has sonWMng more important to write about.— laii Editor.]