RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S. COURT TEMUKA.

Temuka Leader, Issue 609, 22 November 1881, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S. COURT TEMUKA.

Monday, November 21,. 1881. 1 R. mi, Esq., R.M.; ■. CIVIL CASES. Stonyer v. B. Thomson:—Claim £lB, on a dishonored cheque. Mr Knubley for plaintiff, and Mr will for defendant. As the cheque was not produced, the case was adjourned for fourteen days; coats of defendant being allowed,los, and solicitor’s fee, 21s. t Philp v. Shaw—Claim £3 for board and lodging". Mr Johnston for plaintiff, and Mr Jameson for defendant.. Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed, and costs Bs, with, counsel’s fee, 10s 6d. ' His Worship staled that he did not wish to make hurried alterations in regard to allowing professional fees in cases involving sums under £5, but in future no feesi would be allowed, unless in. very ex-j ceptinnal cases. I Whiteliead v. Scannell -Claim £ll6s 6d| Mr Johnston for plaintiff, and Mr Tossl will for defendant. ■ The sum of £1 2s 6d wa? paid in« Court. I Judgment for plaintiff for the balance* with costs. I T. Swinton (trustee in L, Tomb* estate) v. Maclean) —Claim'£2 2s. I Mr Johnston for plaintiff. 9 Judgment for £1 6s. ■ Cooper v. Melnnis. I This was an application for a reheart rB of a case previously disposed of. TIH defendant did not appear. Tlie applicH tion not being in accordance with thfl required by the Act, it was adjourned tH next Court day. H