DUTIES OF A HOUSEMAID
ARBITRATION COURT DECISION. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Greymouth, Nov. 12. An appeal from the decision of the magistrate, Mr. W. Meldrum, in the case of the Department of Labour v. Mrs. A. Mclntyre, licensee of the Duke of Edinburgh Hotel, Greymouth, was heard to-day in the Arbitration Court. The magistrate's decision was to the effect that .the bar was part of the hotel, and a housemaid required to scrub out the bar was not entitled to extra wages for doing so. Mr. Justice Frazer to-day said a housemaid should not be required to scrub the bar, which might be likened to a shop attached to a house. The Court was satisfied that a housemaid’s duties did not extend to the bar; a “general,” however, received 10s weekly more .than a housemaid and scrubbing the bar could be part of her duty. z If a housemaid was employed to do such work she must be paid a general’s wages. The work in most hotel bars was done by a male porter. The Court upheld the appeal and referred the question of costs to the magistrate, with the idea of making a test case.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19261115.2.102
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, 15 November 1926, Page 12
Word count
Tapeke kupu
195DUTIES OF A HOUSEMAID Taranaki Daily News, 15 November 1926, Page 12
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.