Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE TARIFF.

r , IMPROVEMENTS MADE. STATEMENT BY PREMIER. (From Our Parliamentary Reporter.) Wellington, Nov. 18. “I think when members see the tariff again they will agree that it has been improved since it first appeared in the House,” said the Prime Minister in the House of Representatives last night. “J think they will be perfectly satisfied. I do not mean that the tariff will go through without discussion and alteration. I do not expect anything of the sort. But I Ifave never seen a tariff to which so little exception was taken as the present tariff.” Mr. Hanan (Invercargill) : Will you allow any alterations? Mr. Massey: The honorable member will find that his wishes have been anticipated. Much has. been said, continued the Prime Minister, about the tariff on boots. He had received a letter from the largest firm of boot manufacturers and importers in New Zealand .stating that the protection proposed to be given to the boot industry was more than ample. The firm warmly applauded the construction of the new tariff and stated that there had been no dumping from Australia. The trouble had been over-importing. The firm was R. Hannah and Company. Some of the speakers during the debate, continued the Prime Minister, had referred to Australia. The Ciovernment was proposing to take power to negotiate wi(h Australia and with any other British Dominion. He would not say what the Government intended to do until the actual negotiations took place. He would point out to members, however, that Australia had a grievance. New Zealand had grievances also. The Australian grievance was that New Zealand gave much more favorable treatment to South Africa than to Australia in the existing tariff. The duty charged on sparkling wines was 5s per gallon for South African and- l'ss per gallon for Australian. The duty on stjll wines was 2s for South African and 5s for Australian. Maize charge.d 6d per cental from South Africa and 2s per. cental from Australia. The disparity in the case of tobacco had been even more pronounced. He would like to offer to put Australia in the same position as South Africa under the tariff.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19211124.2.55

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 24 November 1921, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
359

THE TARIFF. Taranaki Daily News, 24 November 1921, Page 6

THE TARIFF. Taranaki Daily News, 24 November 1921, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert