Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LIQUOR LAWS.

CASE AGAINST PRIVATE HOTEL. PROPRIETOR OF "CARGEN" IN COURT. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Auckland, Last Night. In the Police Court to-day, Edward Francis Black, proprietor of the "Cargen" private hotel, was charged with having sold whisky, beer and stout without a license.

Sub-Inspector Wohlmanii said that a plain clothes constable was sent to board there, and at various times gave orders to servants for liquor, which, was placed in his room, money being given to the porter on one occasion. In this connection it wap not affirmed that Black had actually sold liquor, which might Lave been obtained outside. The charge related to liquor ordered on a Saturday evening after six o'clock and delivered to the bedroom on Sunday. The constable subsequently paid for the liquor and received a receipt for it. On Christmas Eve the police raided "Cargen." Defendant said that to compete with licensed houses he' was in the habit of giving away about three bottles of whisky a day to guests. Boarders would also give orders, and liquor would be obtained outside, and it frequently happened that the amounts so due were charged up in accounts. As regards the Sunday incident, defendant said he used to borrow from a boarder.

Asked to name one from whom it was likely liquor had been borrowed, the defendant named one who had died a fortnight previously. The Sub-Inspector said the defendant readily disclosed his stock of liquor, which included a considerable quantity. Mr. Reed, for the defence, said the case was a peculiar one, as a great deal depended on what the Magistrate held constituted a sale. There was no question of loose drinking in the hotel. Although it was admitted the order was received, no one could be found who had placed liquor in the bedroom on the Sunday. The hearing was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19200127.2.47

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 27 January 1920, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
306

THE LIQUOR LAWS. Taranaki Daily News, 27 January 1920, Page 5

THE LIQUOR LAWS. Taranaki Daily News, 27 January 1920, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert