SUPREME COURT.
SESSION NEXT WEEK. The quarterly session of the Supreme Court at New Plymouth will commence next Monday at 11 a.m. Mr Justice Hosklng will preside. The list of business sot dawn for hearing follow!: : CRIMINAL. s For Sentence. , Tho King v. Frederick Thomas EUU (false pretences), three charges. ' For Trial." The King v. Margaret Elizabeth Close (manslaughter of an Infant). Tho King v. John Adams (attempted rape.) The King T. Percy Lewis Wa"rd (theft). • The King v. Frederkl; Thomas Ellis (false pretences). CIVIL. Jame3 R. Corrigan v. Notl P'alrahul.—Claim for balance agreed upon (£250). R. T. Rongonul and others v. Te Hoklo.— Claim for debt (£330) and interest (£45). Thomas IClngswell Skinner v. The Phoenix Oil Co.', Ltd.—Claim for rent. Tire N Z. Loan and Mercantile Agency Co.. Ltd., vt Robert Willis—Claim for £432 and Interest ' • * ' William Richard Home r. William Stubbs. —Claim.that defendant execute transfer or In alternative £IOO da'mages. Agnes Mary Torstonson v. Caroline Whiting. —Claim that, contract for sale of land be rectified; that-transfer be executed. Charles William, Williams v. Henry George Knight—£lafm for dissolution of partnership. Charles. Robert Stannard v. Charles Thomas Nicholas.—Claim for performance of spsclflc agreement. William, A. 6'Callaghan v. Benjamin Young Shaw.—Claim for £207 10s. John Thomas Saunders v. T. Kata Thomp-son.-»Cla!m for return of £SO deposit on ' contract unfulfilled. DIVORCE. .M'Kcnna v. M'Kcnna.—Motion for decree absolute. ■ Edith 8.- Sharrock v. Herbert James Shairook. , Francis V. Hanks, y. Jessie Hanks. . Alice Maud Henderson v. William Henderson (defended). William Rlckard v. Mabel Alice Rlckard. Agnes MlEw*n v. Henry Thoma« M'Ewen. Carrie' Kendall v. Thomas William Kendall. BANKRUPTCY. ' Ernest Brocklebank.—Motlon for discharge. Norman C. 'lnnes.—Motion for discharge. John Herbert M'Namara.—Motion for discharge. Harold J. Smith —Motion for .discharge. APPEALS. Barton and Taylor (appellants), E. H. Wilhelm. and The Public Trustee (respondents). —Appeal on point of law from determination of W. Wilson, Stipendiary Magistrate, at Hawera. Willinm George Emeny (appellant), Jeremiah John Nolan (respondent).—Appeal from the determination of J. W. Poyntgn, "Stipendiary Magistrate, at New Plymouth. (For argument). PETITION. (Judicature Act, 1908) In the matter of Carlito Esme Merle Knight, ah Infant. - . ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION. Speddlng and Stalnton v. the schooner "Oitillle Fjord." Burgess, Fraser and Co., Ltd., v. v tho ship "Ottlllle Fjord."—Summons for appointment of Commissioner. Motions for admissions as solicitors and probates.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19190815.2.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, 15 August 1919, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
380SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, 15 August 1919, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.