Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLITICAL NOTES.

| •' . PREJUDICING JURIES. Hon. Mr. Samuel is asking the leader of the Council, (1) Whether his attention lias been called to a statement .published in -4<- lC ' c ' an d newspapers, headed "Jury Again Disagrees," to the effect that His Honor the Chief Justice, on the second trial if a woman accused of a crime, "summed up against the accused," and, on tho Crown Prosecutor applying for a new trial, said "he would take it upon himself to order the trial to be taken at the next criminal sittings at Hamilton (about eighty-six: miles from Auckland, where the accused and her counsel and witnesses reside), so that "there would be no delay. There had been two trials in Aucklandj and it was apparently useless Laving a third. He was not going to have the fair name of the city smirched"? (2) Whether the Government will consider what steps can be taken to prevent publication from prejudicing any jury before whom the trial takes place (at Hamilton, or elsewhere), and from inducing them to assume, either that the accused woman is guilty until proved innocent (instead of innocent until proved guilty), or that she is being subjected to persecution? SUPREME COURT RETURNS. The Hon. Mr. Samuel is to move, That there be laid on the table a return in relation to persons committed for trial or for sentence in the Supreme Court during the years ended June 30, 1914, and June 30, 1917, respectively; the return to show —(1) The number of persons" committed for sentence after a plea of guilty; (2) the number of persons committed for trial; (3) the number of persons convicted by a jury; (4) the number of persons acquitted by a jury, and (5) the number of persons in respect of whose innocence or guilt a jury has failed to agree; stating in each case any retrials that have taken place, and the result of each retrial, and tho place at which and the Judge before whom it was held.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19170912.2.51

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 12 September 1917, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

POLITICAL NOTES. Taranaki Daily News, 12 September 1917, Page 6

POLITICAL NOTES. Taranaki Daily News, 12 September 1917, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert