Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISMISSAL OF PUBLIC SERVANTS.

A MATTER OF DIFFICULTY. (From Our Own Correspondent) Wellington, October 30. "It is extremely difficult for a public servant to get dismissed under any conditions," said an experienced officer in referring to one of the points raised in connection with the Solicitor-General's ruling on the subject of promotion. "The head of his Department cannot dispense with his services, and even the Public Service Commissioners do not appear to have summary powers. I don't think an instance could be quoted of a man being 'fixed' by tho Commissioners (apart from temporary hands) merely because he was not competent." The powers of the (Public Service Commissioners with regard to dismissals are stated in the Public Service Act as follows:

Clause 51.—Every officer shall be deemed to be a three-monthly servant, and removal by the Commissioner at any time after three month*' notice. Clause 52,—1f any officer permanently employed in the Public Service . . is inefficient or incompetent, and such inefficiency or incompetency appears to arise from causes within his own control, he shall be liable to dismissal or to such other punishment as may be determined upon.

The powers given under clause 51 are wide enough to meet any case that may arise, but enquiries made on the point showed that in one instance only have they been used by the Commissioners. Cases of alleged inefficiency are dealt with normally under clause 52, and it h admitted to be a fact that inefficiency, in itself, is not regarded as a ground for dismissal. Tlve officer is not penalised unless "such inefficiency or incompetency appears to arise from causes within ihis own control." • In any 'Case the verdict of the departmental head on the question of efficiency is.'not liual, since tlio officer concerned may demand an enquiry, and then, if the verdict is against him, may appeal to the Board of Appeal constituted under the Act.. Any officer may bo transferred by the head of his Department provided that his salary and status are r.ot changed; but bis salnry *nd status cannot' be 1 reduced by tho departmental head. •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19161102.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 2 November 1916, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
349

DISMISSAL OF PUBLIC SERVANTS. Taranaki Daily News, 2 November 1916, Page 2

DISMISSAL OF PUBLIC SERVANTS. Taranaki Daily News, 2 November 1916, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert