Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUSTRALIAN PROTECTION.

HIGH COURT'S ADVERSE DECISION. Received 27 th, 12,30 a.m. Melbourne, June 26. The High Court gave judgment in connection with the harvester cases, which involved the new protection. Judgment was by a majority against tile Excise Act, under which the new protection was enforced in the harvester and other cases. The Court held that the act In question was not in substance an exercise of the power of taxation conferred on the Commonwealth Parliament by the constitution, Justices Higgins and Isaacs dissented fitJm the judgment.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19080627.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 160, 27 June 1908, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
87

AUSTRALIAN PROTECTION. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 160, 27 June 1908, Page 2

AUSTRALIAN PROTECTION. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 160, 27 June 1908, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert