SUPREME COURT SESSIONS.

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 73, 16 March 1908, Page 3

SUPREME COURT SESSIONS.

The Xew Plymouth sessions ol the Supreme Court open on Wednesday; morning before Mr. Justice Edward's. The calendar is as published below. The criminal business is not of great bulk, but there is an unusually long list ot civil actions. CRIMINAL.

Rex v. Stewart, causing actual bodily harm (Mr Johnstone for accused); Rex v. Burcb, alias Angus, theft; Rex v. korth, false pretences; Rex. v. Copestake, forging and uttering (for sentence).

CIVIL Before a jury of twelve—and others (Mr bpeuce) v. Tkurkinglou (.Mr Johnstone;, ciaiui ,£034 14s 4d under contract to scrub and fell bush. Before the Judge—Crautou (Mr. (juilliam) v. Wotnington (Mr Hutchen), claim £2Ol on dishonored postal note. Marett and another (Mr. C. H. Weston) v. Swan and otners (Mr Izard), claim for specific performance of an agreement to purchase and damages. Shodroski (Mr Weston) v. Hadley Co. and another (Mr Johnstone), claim for possession of land. New Plymouth Sash and Door Fac-

Tory and Timber Co. (Jlr. Quilliani) v. Bank of New Zealand (llr. Roy)., and Smart Bros. (Mr J. E. Wilson) v. Bank of Sew Zealand (Mr. Roy), claim under the Contractors aud Workmen's Lien Act. 1892.

Archer (Mr. v. Funnell (Mr Spence), claim for £250 damages and specific performance. Sampson (Mr. Roy) v. New Plymouth Harbor Board (Mr. Quilliam), for a d'. 1 - cree establishing plaintiff's right to fee simple in section 1.37, Hua. Coleman (Mr. -Crump) v. Thurkington (Mr. Anderson), claim for compensation.

Spence (Mr. Caplen) v. Bolger and Maddock (Mr. Welsh), for rent and possession of land.

Hughes (Mr Hutchen) v. Skinner (Mr Quilliam), claim ££oo value of improvement to land. Skinner (Mr Quilliam) v. Hughes (Mr Hutchen), claim £77 3s 2d on postal note. Paine and another (Mr. Caplen) v. Paine, for removal of trustee and winding up of estate. McLennan v. Malone ami another, originating summons (Mr Johnstone). APPEALS. Xops and Kemp, appellants (Mr. Anderson) v. Kelly (respondent), appeal from decision of SJI. at Stratford. Mclvor. appellant (Mr Kerr) v. Thomson, respondent (Mr J. E. Wilson), ap|>eal from decision of S.M. at New Plymouth. DIVORCE. Kendell (Mr. Quilliam) v. Kendell (no appearance entered), petition for dissolution of marriage. McDonald (Mr Thomson) v. McDonald and another, petition for dissolution of marriage.