RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT, TE AROHA. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1888. (Before H. W. Northcroft, Esq., R.M).
Civs. Norris v. Collet and Thaxter, claim £20 for wages due. Nonsuited. Police v. R. Brown. This was a charge arising out of a breach of suln section 22, section 3 (part 1), of the Police Offences A.ct. Fined 10a ; witness, expenses, 73, and court Costs, which amounted to 11s. JB. Montague v. H. Le Green, claim for wages at the rate of 7s per day. The plaintiff stated he worked twelve days and a half for the defendant and received for the work £2 in cash, and wns told to call again for balance (£2 9s 2d). He called twice, but was not paid. B. Montague, contractor, stated that when he employed him it was with the understanding that he should be paid according to his worth. He considered he was well paid. His Worship gave judgement for the plaintiff at the rate of 7s per day, making a deduction for board and goods supplied, leaving 18s 8d for the plaintiff. Court costs Bs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18881024.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 310, 24 October 1888, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
180RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT, TE AROHA. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23,1888. (Before H.W. Northcroft, Esq., R.M). Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 310, 24 October 1888, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in