SUPREME COURT BUSINESS.

Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 272, 13 June 1888, Page 4

SUPREME COURT BUSINESS.

Auckland, June 9.\ ] His Ho.noii Mr Justice Gillies has roturned from WolliiiKton, where he has been attending the Appeal Court, and ho will opon the Criminal Session of tho Supreme Court hero on Monday next at 11 o'clock. The following Hat of eases is set down for hearing : — CRIMINAL CALKNIMB. The criminal enlendnr includes 33 eases us follows :— Henry Thornton Rowo. attempt to furimllv know "a child under 12 years of uge; Henry tirmth and John Kelly, arson; William Nelson, larocny ; Albert (Jetavius Stodart, forging nnd uttering; Hernia Ngakohalu and To Kuni, false piotcnces; Pine Awanuiand Potahi Ntttana, false pretences ; Pine Awnnui »nd Teare Tnotno. false pretences ; Hemi Ngawaka and Pine Awanui, false pretences; Ngare Rawluiti, Hemi, and Pine Awanui, false pretences ; Tamo Ngawaka and Pine Awanui. lalso protences; Day id Ashur, falso pretences (2 chafes) ; Hotu Rapihann. rape ; John Phillips and Frank Walton, forcing and uttering ; Nicholas Hand, Henry Arthur and Alfred Will am C'raekncll, assault and robbery: Robert Johnson and Edward Mumford, breaking and entering; Bridget Johnston, rereninj," stolen propeitj : Thomas Keuned.r. horse - stealing ; Edward Howoll, horse stealing; William Smith, horse-stealing; Henry Palmer, indecent assault; Robert Foster, alias George McKnj . forging and uttering ; Horace "Wood, breaking nnd enteriiiK; Donlon Leslie Toward, forpeiy. CIVIL BUSINESS. The following civil c.isos will be takrn after the criminal culcndar is disponed of:-Mnsp-fleld and Co. v. John Jjundon, 4s 4ii, dishonoured Promissory Note ; Lawrence A. Lc\.t ->.M. Montague, CIO. dishonoured I\N. ; .lames Lurk en v. James OBrien, tor dissohaion of purtuordhip and taking account^; Thoma-j Teasdale \ . National Bank of New Zealand. £100, dnmnges for dishonoured P.N.; Bank ot New .South Wales v. D. H. X 282 oa. otcklih> P.N. ; Arthur 1). Uennett v. North Now Zealand Woollen Manufacturing Company, £179 bs 2d, being for cash npent and ncwices rendered in the formation of the defendant company : Louis Ehronfiicd v. Pat nek Lynch, for po^seßSion of Greyhound Hotel and mesne profits. There i« a cotinler claim between the parties. Ueovgo White \. James Morell Metcalfe and Be-isie Mctcatfc. CI.OOO. damages for alleged libel ; Charles Ross C. Smith r. James lUorcll Metculfe and Bestir Metcalfe, £1,000. damages ftnalleged libel ; C.H.C. Smith \ . W. (J.AI on, £?.00. damages ior alleged slander: James Maxwell v. National Mank of New Zealand, jl3oO, amount of a cheque marked by defendant company as good ; Ana Freestone t. Thomas Brutton Rendcrdine.£4oo.damagesforalleKed negligent treatment ; Bank of New South Wales v. the Auckland Imestmont Company and others, 12,74t % Bd, money advanced.