THE FISHERIES DISPUTE.
A special dispatch from Washington, April 26th, says there are some indications that a proclamation of non-intercourse with Canada, on the basis of the Edmunds Bill, is regarded as possible, while Salisbury's latest proposition to extend the provisions of the Washington Treaty without an indemnity clause is considered at Gloucester (Mass.,) an impudent proposition, because of its carrying with it the free fish clause. The conclusion is, therefore, believed to be inventable that non-intercourse will first have to be proclaimed, to be followed, as is anticipated, by the appointment of a commission to adjust the matters in dispute, which was the course originally recommended.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18870604.2.38.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume IV, Issue 206, 4 June 1887, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
107THE FISHERIES DISPUTE. Te Aroha News, Volume IV, Issue 206, 4 June 1887, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in