DEPARTMENTAL INCONSIST- ENCY.

Taihape Daily Times, 11 July 1919, Page 4

DEPARTMENTAL INCONSISTENCY.

! I Th‘ ‘ Ql. bQe]’%ou ‘*la”“:e’tised\ fqayd ’r~ ‘i :I‘Ri(i:: ' . Suze; :ifiW]liGherQQQS‘t§t.e& ~g ‘Na gk ‘gelit --30113 I°9s‘ 3’ th ti)" eQ\i‘* I 1 ‘W iQ‘°‘t\ blt“‘§vT‘é§~)‘ ind {he 6.. tliQ‘~ill S a"; (2 Vs’? .~11~ :1 G 6 96 ~33: ' Inbltal Qa,l.r‘ %t;§t .M 0 t \\,h‘al~S~é: N h Qllt let led €sl fnfia 19h ‘vllfé, T. OW Vfiit L 0x» be aregr er: area wk _tllé I3il.i=t~,V'Qrti RL. I lat ’ ‘vine his 1. in exyth ans Se. fill“ Dir ~§*vo’Q“*lql“° I:‘l‘““¥s:q° am?” 11%“ £3315) ~ar::lllil.ed3 tl:E‘irit:d \,:‘3”.3 vfrtislell ! Ry tine 3&0 ltgq ‘VOII Dear ed es Wu and ""3 ll fiOl~ if 1d bQ“ ill “Ila -th ‘lsio Tu tie. 1:11 We 9 Q ‘QI he ‘Q I 1 0f Qsda Qlsio Q Q] Q 0 arri 8 Qll ST!" 13 5* Q 1311 1113 ed. the ‘lrtméeted Q9l.‘ nlornibetwge in sub‘ . 31111 .sQI~V,.nt - list Win 11%, 9911 Tll‘ 111 101% ‘Ge: °l“l\[Q‘ lare Q i Wr SQ» g t Q spin the [3 ea hf-0 th 01.91 0 h \y»h_ ts . ‘ 11d ‘T . 1&1} ‘(.11 5’ an 10h 111 $131311 :13, the eer thay rtm Il‘ \\ile‘ M 1 atig xvii all : ~W_ t H ant gum Qn 11 S '3‘ 119“ 1118 ‘IQ ‘ \ D!» 1; V‘) 1‘ Qmi 00111 ‘N V llligt sine and ll\»\,,agt\ :{°flls~““‘.~ a in '°‘lell"‘lie “t I, “big” that .1"§ “<1 ’a‘il\§H£Q’ bu “I<le“‘~s,_ !It i 111 Q Drag TVIIGII Hy Cl‘ ire Sll S\Q flea th. tru ‘it Q | 3% at ma 115, 9 Data a. E. x\ ifillo rlV;(§§.B Is all QB is ‘lnks 11 ‘II3 ‘I; ‘s‘ {Gen t art lirt 0 3‘ 0 1 r I 1 I th be be M‘ men 211:3 lent a. IDIQ‘I rare Qarlver: g§~e t 3 te *9‘: is ‘ 130 At ’ :1 ffha 111133 aIIY ‘IQ Ild > \ . _to rate Q 3 ) W 123 \\-Qaggr Qhye dc \ Gk“