Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.
SUPREME COURT.
AUCKLAND SESSIONS. [Per Press Association.] Auckland, May 23. In the re-hearing of the divorc. case Craig v. Craig and Henry Hargreaves, co-respondent, which was not defended, it -was agreed that it was unnecessary to repeat the evidence. Mr Justice Edwards said no doubt petitioner was given to drunken habit; but that was no reason for refusing a decree. Costs were granted oi the highest scale against the co-re-soondent.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130524.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVI, Issue 16, 24 May 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
70SUPREME COURT. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVI, Issue 16, 24 May 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in