Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Board balks at cable rental

King Country Energy Board directors have objected strongly to a proposal by the Department of Conservation (DoC ) to charge a rental determined by the turnover generated by the new Turoa Skifield connection.

DoC has asked that the board pay 1.75% of its turnover from Turoa per year as a rental for the use of land on which the connecting cable runs as well as ensuring an easement agreement is reached to allow access to the cable. Mr Till estimates this would cost the board about $3500 per year, and more when use expands or when electricity tariffs rise. Board member Tony Palmers said he was against the proposal in principle. "I cannot accept a system where rental is based on usage. In a normal rental system

you offer a fixed rate and then review it every three years." After much discussion the board decided to offer DoC a rental of $3500, to be paid for a term of three years at which point it would be reviewed. "We should try and think like DoC. They want some form of trickle fed income and I don't blame them for that. I think we should pay them a fixed rental of $3500 each year and review it after three years," he said. Mr Till said a similar system is already in operation whereby Turoa Skifield pays DoC a

rental for the land they used based on income. This, he said was fair as more people put more pressure on the National Park in which the mountain is situated, and there should be compensation for this. "A cable will not, however, put more pressure on the park as more power is used," said Mr Till Kit Wilson said he agreed with Mr Palmer's comments that it is the principle of the rental which is the issue and the board should offer to pay a fixed amount of $3500 for three years and then review the situation. Mr Wilson also suggested the board offer a one-off payment to reflect the cost of setting up the cable though this was discussed but not adopted. Gordon Gower asked what legal right DoC

have to impose such a rental. "The national Park is for the people and we are helping to encourage people to use it," said Mr Gower. "They are a National Park and they can do anything they like," said Mr Till. He said the board is not being charged for running cables to the Whakapapa skifield.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RUBUL19910219.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 8, Issue 374, 19 February 1991, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
417

Board balks at cable rental Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 8, Issue 374, 19 February 1991, Page 3

Board balks at cable rental Ruapehu Bulletin, Volume 8, Issue 374, 19 February 1991, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert