Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH POLICY

(Presa. Assn.-

SAFEGUARD PREFERENCES

— By Telegraph — Copyright).

JK.ec. Aug. 18, 7 p.m. Ottawa, August 17. The report of the Committee of Commercial Relations with Foreign Powers, which was issued to-night, states that the representatives of Empire Governments declared that it is their policy that no future treaty obligations should he allowed to interfere with the mutual preferences which the Empire Governments might decide to accord each other, and that they would free themselves from anv

existing "favoured-nation" treaties which might so interfere. They would in fact, take all the steps necessary to implement and safeguard the preferences granted. Regarding the tendencies of foreign countries to conclude regional agreements for mutual preferences there was general agreement that foreign countries having existing treaty obligations to grant favoured-nation treatment to the products of particular parts of the Empire, could not be allowed to override such obligations by regional agreements. Particular reference was made to the Danubian States regarding preferential treatment of cereal exports. The committee was informed that at Lausanne the rights of third countries had been expressly reserved at Britain's instance. The committee recognised that "favoured-nation" rights do not preclude a foreign country seeking the consent of Empire Governments to waiving their rights in particular cases. These Governments must be guided by their individual interests, in deciding whether to meet a foreign country's wishes so long however, as tne general £rinciple that rights of this kind cannot he arbitrarily withdrawn, is fully and carefully preserved. The committee recommends where two Empire Governments share a common interest in any treaty waiving the prop-osal, they should consult together with a view to arriving at a common policy.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RMPOST19320819.2.40.2

Bibliographic details

Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 305, 19 August 1932, Page 5

Word Count
275

BRITISH POLICY Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 305, 19 August 1932, Page 5

BRITISH POLICY Rotorua Morning Post, Volume 2, Issue 305, 19 August 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert