Mr North’s Appeal.
Tun appeal in the case of North v. Williams was to have been heard to-day in Auckland, before Judge Gillies; but we understand that Mr Harnerton objected, on behalf of the trustee and others, to have the appear heard until the terms of Judge Rawson’s decision at Patea have been complied with, namely payment of the costs of defence in the first rule to upset proof of debt. The costs of the defending side have been taxed at a few shillings below £l2O, and this is the amount which will have to be paid before the appeal can be heard. We believe the costs on Mr North’s side for getting the four rules' nisi in New Plymouth, the expense of which has to come out of the estate, have been taxed at about £IBO. The two sides have thus spent in law costs about £3OO up to date. The whole estate was sold for £7OO by resolution of the creditors, so that nearly half as much money has been spent in legal disputes, and these are to be resumed, we suppose, when the District Court sits again tomorrow week, as only one rule out of four was disposed of at the previous long sitting of 21 days.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PATM18820814.2.12
Bibliographic details
Patea Mail, 14 August 1882, Page 3
Word Count
210Mr North’s Appeal. Patea Mail, 14 August 1882, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.