“A PRIOR ATTACHMENT”
MARLBOROUGH MARRIAGE REASONS FOR*'ANNULMENT. N 7>. ROME, November 25. The text of the finding of the Roman Catholic Church tribunal which annulled the Marlborough marriage shows that the tribunal affirms that it was a prior attachment on the part of the Duchess which made the marriage unhappy from tho start. was confirmed by all the witnesses, including the Duke of Marlborough, the Duchess, and Mrs W. K. Vanderbilt. Accordingly, Miss Consuelo Vanderbilt was not given the necessary liberty of contract to make the marriage valid. The Duke of Marlborough married Consuelo Vanderbilt, daughter of the late W. K. Vanderbilt, of New York, in J 895. The parties wero legally divorced in 1920 on a suit brought by the Duchess, and they both married again, the Duke Miss Deacon, of Boston and the Duchess Lieut.-Colonel Jacques Balsan, a French aviation officer. Recently the Vatican annulled the Marlborough marriage, apparently at the reouost of the former Duchess, who claimed that the marriage was arranged against her wialiwu
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19261127.2.56
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12615, 27 November 1926, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168“A PRIOR ATTACHMENT” New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12615, 27 November 1926, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in