Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

WIDOW CLAIMS DAMAGES. As the outcome, of a collision between a motor-car and a motor-lorry on the main highway between Foxton and Levin at night in August, 1939, the hearing of an action was commenced in the° Supreme Court,, yesterday, in which Mrs Marjorie Weir Way, widow, of Levin, claimed £3025 from Brian Leslie Everton, stock dealer, and Thomas Gerrard Alexander Marchant, lorry driver, both of Levin, as compensation for the death of her husband, Bertie Rupert AVay. The case was heard bv the Chief Justice. Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Myers, and a jury of twelve. Mr 0. C- Mazengarb (AVellington) and Mr N. M. Thomson (Levin) appeared for plaintiff, and Mr G. Crosslev for defendants. Mr G. G. Watson (AVellington) appeared for B. It. Way, Limited, joined by defendants as a third party. The statement of claim set out that on August 15, 1939, defendant Everton was the owner and defendant Marchant the driver of a motor-lorry concerned in a collision with a car driven bv Joseph Henry John Hayfield, also of Levin. As a result of the accident Mr Way, a passenger in

the car, was killed instantly. Negligence was alleged against defendants, it being contended that the lorry was unlighted. The claim was for £25 4s 6d special damages and £3OOO general damages.

The statement of defence denied all allegations of negligence on the part of the lorry driver. As an alternative ground for defence it was alleged that Hayfield failed to keep a proper lookout, drove the vehicle at a speed which was excessive, and failed to avoid defendant’s vehicle by stopping or steering clear. Further, the defence stated that Hayfield was at all times under the control of AVay and that, if it were proved that either was negligent, then Way was identified with that negligence and, again, that the collision was due to the negligence of Way. Defendants named B. R. AA r ay. Ltd., the company of which deceased was the largest shareholder, as a third party.

The jury was as follows: Messrs E. W. Sweetman (foreman), F. D. Collis, H. E. Lush, AV. I. Hearsey, T. E. Rose, J. Dobson, AV. P. Hope, M. R. Finn, J. R. Blackwell, C. R. Broughton, R. W. S. Currie, AV. D. Woodham.

After several witnesses had been heard the hearing was adjourned until 10.15 a.m. to-day.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19400507.2.109

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 134, 7 May 1940, Page 10

Word Count
393

SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 134, 7 May 1940, Page 10

SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 134, 7 May 1940, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert