Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Peculiar Case.

fBY TELKGRAPH.) (PEE UNITED PBESS ASSOCIATION.) Timaru, Juaa 23. In the Supreme Court, the case of Hayhurst v, Matthews and Tres : ze closed last evening, a geaeral verdict being returned for the defendants. An interesting point aro3e m tbe case. One of the covenants of the leasa wa6 that three consecutive coin crops should not be taken ofi tbe land. The evidence of several experts was taken, and a lengthy argument was heard as to whether the lessor intended by chis covenant to forbid tbe sowing a third crop of wheat, or whether to merely forbid the growing to maturity of a third crop . Did gram crop mean turnips, rape,potatoes, beans, &c, or could immature wheat be so described 1 Opinions were divided, but as the defendants bad cut the third crop when m an immature state, the jury found for them.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18830626.2.21

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume 4, Issue 172, 26 June 1883, Page 2

Word Count
145

A Peculiar Case. Manawatu Standard, Volume 4, Issue 172, 26 June 1883, Page 2

A Peculiar Case. Manawatu Standard, Volume 4, Issue 172, 26 June 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert