Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“ NOT TOO SHOOK ON THE VERDICT.”

Mary Jane O’Driscoll asked the S.M. Court at New Plymouth to grant a separation order in respect of her marriage with Jeremiah O’Driscoll. The husband protested, but his oratory was futile ; he offered to take her back, but the Magistrate decided the action against defendant, who, by the way, had conducted his own case. Defendant greeted the decision as follows :—•" In this case, Mrs O’Driscoll has got all she asked. I’ve made a pretty good fist of the case for a layman, and got nothing. Have I any right of appeal ? I’m not too shook 011 the verdict.” His Worship: “No; and be careful what you say, or you’ll be committed for contempt of Court.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH19110318.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 968, 18 March 1911, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
121

“ NOT TOO SHOOK ON THE VERDICT.” Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 968, 18 March 1911, Page 3

“ NOT TOO SHOOK ON THE VERDICT.” Manawatu Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 968, 18 March 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert