Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton.

CIVIL:

Before H. W. Brabant Esq, El Wednesday 7th May.

Foxton Borough Cotoctl t. W. J . Po t. Clim for rates £1 17* 4d. No appearance of defendant. Judgement tor atnouut and costs 15s. WJ.Q .in v. Mud ord bros. Adjournud t.« next si tiiig day McMillan Rhodes & Uo v. William Robertson »nd H. H. Kuowles. Cairn £82 6s 3d Mr Ray appeared fo;.* p'aiutiflf-. • no appedrince of de fendan h. Judgement for amount and costs £2 16a and wituesa 2 days ami railway fare; soliaitor'a fee £2 2s. Mr Robertsoo appetred aometijie after judgement was eutered up, aud api-liod for the case to be re instated. Upon the fee being paid, this w allow d, but a ter much unnecessary evid 'nee, the Resident Magistrate con-fii-m-.dhia- previous, judgement in every particular. ■ McMi lan, Rhodes & Co v. Jensen & Derby. < laim £25 6* lOd. Mr ti ay appeared for plaintiff. No ap* pearauce ef defendants* judgement for amount o a ; iued. Costs US 2s; soicito ;hi fee. £.2 2s. E. a&wae.T. W. T. R. Cook. Claim 14s '4d Mr. Ray for plajntiit ; no appearance of defendauk. Judgement for amount claiujei. Costs £t ; SQlioi^or*B'fee £1 Is. E.To!mery. : Wi S..te.p'hensou. Adjonrned for uiie mbnthoii applicati i of Mr Ray for tbe judgement creditor. T. Funstou v. Wi Ori. Claim IBs lid. Mr Ray for- plaintiff. Judgement for plaintiff by oonaent for £3 14s 4d costs 17s ; solicitor! fea, £1 Is Bacon & Speirs v. J. CilinJ Claim £1 Is. Mr Ray appeare 1 foi plaintiff. Dfendaut had paid lfts into Court which was not accepted This was a alaitu for *n extra su n due o.u some bricks which 'iad be"i charged and paid for at half prie -. The k.M. said »t appeared that t'-ie plaintiffs sold 600 bricks to de eidant;" the plaintiff Spei.« sw€»r§ thai lie agr.ed tUsit the price shou d be 70<j per 1000 which defendant denies but the plaintiff ''bought some more at aame price immediately afterwa ds at 7s per 100. He therefore bolievred; the price was 70s p"i 1000. . judgemeat for pla : ntiflF foi amount, costs 9d, witness us.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MH18900509.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Manawatu Herald, Volume III, 9 May 1890, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton. Manawatu Herald, Volume III, 9 May 1890, Page 2

Resident Magistrate's Court, Foxton. Manawatu Herald, Volume III, 9 May 1890, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert