Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN’S COURT.

Wednesday, October 19. [Before H. A. Stratford, Esq., Warden ] APPLICATIONS. Curtis and Cook applied by their agent, Mr Hannan, for the registration of a tunnel.—The application was adjourned for a week. Thomson and party applied for a month’s protection of their double area at the Shallow Lead. Mr Barff appeared for the applicants.—The application was refused as waler was proved to be available. J. Kirkman applied by his ageut, Mr Barff, fur a residence area at Dill man’s Town. Mr Hannan appeared for an objector (Mr Thomas). Evidence was taken, and it Was shown that the trenching was not in accordance with the mining regulations.—The application was refused.

The application of Solomon Pascoe for a residence aiea was granted, subject to the usual conditions.

The application of Preston and party by their agent, Mi Bartf, for a double area at Deep Creek was granted. Romas and party applied for a special site, which was granted conditionally. Harris and party applied for protection for their claim.—Granted for one month.

The application of White and party for a special site was granted conditionally.

T. Couuington applied for the registration of a tunnel.—The application was granted, The application of F. Fields fo'f a residence area in Tui street was granted, subject to the usual conditions and scale of fees. Smart and party applied for a double area.—Granted. An application of D. Hannan, in respect of a residence area, was adjourned for the purpose of having new notices posted. SUIT. Michael O’Grady v. Keogh and otheia. Mr Hannan appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Seddon for the defendants. This was a suit for dissolution of a mining partnership. A large amount of evidence was taken, and the plaintiff was nonsuited. The Court was adjourned till to-day (Thursday).

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KUMAT18811020.2.9

Bibliographic details

Kumara Times, Issue 1580, 20 October 1881, Page 2

Word Count
295

WARDEN’S COURT. Kumara Times, Issue 1580, 20 October 1881, Page 2

WARDEN’S COURT. Kumara Times, Issue 1580, 20 October 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert