TE KUITI S.M. COURT.

King Country Chronicle, Volume VI, Issue 510, 19 October 1912, Page 5

TE KUITI S.M. COURT.

THURSDAY, 17th OCTOBER, 1912 Before Mr F. O'B. Loughnan, S.M. Judgment went by default in the following undefended cases:—Green and Colebrook, Ltd. (Mr Hine), v. Th Wipa, £4 4s 8d and costs; same v. Wi Kio, £l9 Is 5d and costs; same v. Mihi Apitaru, £6 7s 4d and coats; same v. Whau, £5 lis 6d and costs; same v, Pua and Co. £5 12s and costs; same V. Pua, £l2 9s lid and costs; same v. Paul £8 163 lid, and costs; same v. Walker, £lB 15s and costs; same v. H. Rawiri, £l9 8s 6d and costs; same v. Rawiniaia, £4 8s 8d and costs; Mac Donald v. Hallmond, £7 12s 9d and costs: Guardian Tcust v. Tuhkea, £3 5s and costs; Rundle v. Bolton, £3 5s and costs; Hose v Fraei, £2 18s and costs; Nichulls v. Pebau, £5 Os 9d and costs; same v. Te Pua, £lO Is 3d and costs; same v. Tariao, £6 8s 3d and costs; same v. Pua, £5 2s lOd and costs; Cotter Bros. v. Tarrant, £6 10s 9d and costs. Judgment Summonses —Stevens v. Robertson, Mr Hine for judgment creditor, £6 8s 3d. Order made in default seven days' imprisonment.— Williams and Bruce v. Waaka, £3l 19s Id, Mr Finlay for judgment creditor. Order made for £2 per month or in default 30 days' imprisonment. —Graham v. O'Sullivan, £1 9s 9d. Order made or in default four days' imprisonment. —Hattaway and Fitzpatrick v. Holland, £22 14s 3d. Order made for £3 per month or in default 21 days' imprisonment. DEFENDED CASES. Jacob v. Pratt, claim £26 for cost of erecting fence. Mr Finlay appeared for plaintiff and Mr Howarth for defendant. Lengthy evidence having been heard his Worship decided that the claim for erecting the fence could not be upheld and gave judgment for half cost of repairing the fence £4, with costs. Mcßae v. .trap, claim £lB 13s Sd for the erv-tion of a building at Rangitoto. Mr Finlay appeared for plaintiff and Mr Sharpies for defendant. The defence was to the effect that plaintiff had been paid for time worked, which was less than the time claimed for. His Worship gave judgment for plaintiff for £2 2s 7d and costs. Roe v. Lawson, claim for balance due for erecting a building, and a counter claim on behalf of defendant. Mr Howarth appeared for plaintiff and Mr Finlay for defendant. After hearing lengthy evidence, his Worship gave judgment on the claim for plaintiff for £SQ, and for defendant on the counter claim for £lO 7s fid, while plaintiff I was awarded £2 10s. Costs were allowed in each instance. McQuarrie v. Murnan, claim £2B 6s 6d. Mr Howarth appeared for .plaintiff and Mr Finlay for defendant. After hearing evidence his Worship gave judgment for plaintiff for £l6 Is 6d and costs. 1