An effort was;-made in a Sydney I ; Wrt recently to prove that an oystejr -is a fish—but without success. The 1 ‘tionary calls it a molusc, but undei k New South Wales, law it is a wild During the argument it was -cind necessary to establish' whether a place where only oysters were consumed was a fish shop or not. The magistrate gave it up—so in New South Wales oysters will remain wild beasts; and will not even cOme under the Birds and Animals Protection Act.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HPGAZ19280210.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIX, Issue 5237, 10 February 1928, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
86Untitled Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIX, Issue 5237, 10 February 1928, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hauraki Plains Gazette. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in