THE LIQUOR LAW.
DEFINITION OF “RESTAURANT.”
INTERESTING PAEROA 'CASE,
James Burt was charged at the S.M. Court on Monday, before Mr JSalmon, with having purchased liquor and brought the same into Paeroa without informing the vendor thafi he was going tp bring the liquor into a no-license district. He had also consumed the liquor on the premises of a boardinghouse. Michael Burke accompanied Burt on the occasion mentioned. Constable J. McCHhchy gave evidence for the Police, and read signed statements Ire had obtained from the accused. The men were .both hard-working persons, and had made «an honest admission of. their doings. His Worship,’ to’ Sergt. O’Grady : You. cannot say ,a bedroom, in a boar 1inghouse is a restaurant, and therefore a place where liquor must not be consumed. .The occupier and family, even of a restaurant, could partake of liquor in the restaurant. A conviction - was recorded for bringing liquor into Ohinemuri without. notifying the licensee, but the charges for drinking the liquor on unlicensed premises, a restaurant, were dismissed in regard to both men. j The costs on the first charge amounted to £2.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HPGAZ19220517.2.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4415, 17 May 1922, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
185THE LIQUOR LAW. Hauraki Plains Gazette, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4415, 17 May 1922, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hauraki Plains Gazette. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in