Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

JUDGE’S DECISION

(By Telegraph—Press Association)

GISBORNE, Nov. 21

Holding that plaintiffs had not proved negligence on the part of defendants, .Justice Ostler gave judgment for defendants at the Supreme Court in the action in which Percy and Gordon Breitman (son and father) claimed ;C3(M.) damages for an injury to Percy ;n lad of 14 years’) who lost Jour fingers in a mincing machine at defendant’s butrhorv.

His Honour expressed the opinion it was not negligence on the part of the employer, not to know the machine was defective, when the defect was not reported by the employee. The Judge awarded £415, less costs of the action, as full compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19291121.2.43

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1929, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
116

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1929, Page 5

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert