Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH PARLIAMENT

ABOUT THE -MERGER

COMMONS PIIOAIISED A REVIEW. (United Press Association.--By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.) LONDON, AJay 22. Jn tho House of Commons, Sir ]la mar Greenwood (Conservative) said lie disagreed with Air Baker’s conclusions in favour of State control "of communications, which, in view of State lack of capital, made for under-development of a great experiment. The State-owned cables and beam system had been excellent, but was now time that they were transferred to private enterprise. This was an opportunity to make a good bargain on the rising market. -Mr Ammon (.Labour ex-Alinisteiq said: “There seems to be an atmosphere of corruption and wire-pulling about the wireless communication and the (able companies that is almost without parallel in the history of commerce.”

Cuptan Inn Eraser (Conservative) said the merger proposed was “ a marriage of two entities, one of which owned the best method of transmitting messages, while the other owned the best method of collecting iaiid bandling.” He believed that those in favour of the nationalisation of this industry were serving a political doctrine. rather than the needs of the country.

Sir John Gilmour (Conservative) speaking as Chairman of the Cable Conference, detailed the progress of its inquiries. He pointed out that the problem was not an easy one to unravel. It involved considerable research. They had to consider the "repercussion in Australia and the other Dominions and Colonies. The Government, he said, accepted no responsibility for the merger, which was to be subject to a satisfactory arrangement with the Governments of Britain and the Dominions and India. All of the possible, reaction from the merger lmtl been examined in detail by the Conference. Sir John Gilmour added that Air Baker had expressed the iear that the House ol Commons had been deprived of an opportunity of considering the problem before the beam-cable merger had become an accomplished fact. Consultations and communications were still proceeding. He could not say alien they would be concluded. When the Conference made its recommendations, the British and Dominion Governments would decide on their wtion. Before anv definite conclusions were taken the matter would he hi ought before the House of Commons. He hoped this tvpuld reassure the doubters. Air Vernon Hartshorn (Labour) said he welcomed Sir John Gilmour’s announcement. The debate then concluded.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280523.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 23 May 1928, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
379

BRITISH PARLIAMENT Hokitika Guardian, 23 May 1928, Page 2

BRITISH PARLIAMENT Hokitika Guardian, 23 May 1928, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert