Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WAITOMO CASE

COOK CLAIMS DAM AG FS FOR j LOSS OF POSITION. I | i AUCKLAND, .March 22. J An echo of a seaman’s strike at Auckland in February, 1020, was heard in the Supreme Court to-day. when x ci'aim for £2O damages was made by Ernest Arnold, ship’s cook (Air Cahill), against Thomas Frederick Anderson, union secretary (Air Holmdcn) ami i David Frederick Wright, greaser (Air | Vialoux), on the grounds that they I ((inspired with seamen and the Union I Steam Ship Company, Ltd., to procure plaintiff’s dismissal from service. -Mr Cahill said that in February, 1929, when the incidents occurred which gave rise to the present, action | plaintiff was cook on the steamer Wai- ; tomo, on which Wright was a fireman. Anderson was then secretary of the | Auckland branch of the seamen’s union. t)u February 2,'J, 1929. when the vessel was at Auckland the breakfast menu included sausages, and complaint was made by several firemen, including' j Wright, who acted as spokesman, that j these were bad. Tbcv were shown to I the cook, who admitted they were sour 1 and immediately provided other meat, j The merits of these particular sans-' ages had been thoroughly discussed in the Police Court when the firemen of I the Waitomo were each lined Co for! refusing to obey lawful commands. Air C.'abill : ft may seem trivial, but I it resulted in tbe Union Company j being forced to lay un tbe vessel for I some months. . His Honor; Some months! What, ! on account of these sausages? j Air Cahill: AVell, yes. They were tbe j primary cause. The firemen stated! that if tbe cook were not , dismissed | -.icy would not sail. Feeling against) 1 plaintiff then spread to other vessels, | and Anderson finally advised plaintiff to leave the ship, as if he did not Ihcrc would he no hope of the AVaitomo securing a crew. When Arnold stated that he had no intention of leaving. Air Cahill eontin-j lied, Anderson said tho vessel would he j declared “black.” This was evidently clone, as the AVaitomo lay idle in the ' harbour for months. The Union Com- j pany at last took defendant from the • Wnitomo and placed him on the Kni-! toke, but'it was not deemed advisable to leave, him there, as there were further signs of trouble. TJe was given a day’s wages and had not lieen employed by the company since, as it was feared trouble would be created whereevor be event. His Honor: That is what is known as tbe “ brotherhood of labour,” I suppose. * The hearing was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19270324.2.34

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 24 March 1927, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
431

THE WAITOMO CASE Hokitika Guardian, 24 March 1927, Page 4

THE WAITOMO CASE Hokitika Guardian, 24 March 1927, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert