Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

DUNEDIN SITTINGS.

1 lIV Tfc'I.EGItAPII—PER PRESS ASSOCIATION!

DUNEDIN, Feb. 15

At the Supreme Court to-day George Devinney, who was yesterday found guilty, with a strong recommendation to mercy, on a charge of shooting with intern to do grievious bodily harm, came up for sentence.

Mr Justice Sim said in view of the jury’s recommendation and accused’s previous good chamfer, he would be justified in indicting a pecuniary penally. Accused was fined £SO.

Fidmund Traherne was charged with attempted murder and shooting with intent to do grievious bodily harm to one, George Wilson, of Cannibal Ray, Owakn. Accused was found not guilty. Both charges of shooting appealed to tie theresult of a drunken spree. Robert Brims, storekeeper, of Kurow, was charged with having had carnal knowledge with a girl of 14 years of age. He was found guilty. Sentenced to two years’ hard labor.

WEI/LINGTON SITTINGS. WELLINGTON, Feb. 15

At the Supreme Court, John Neil, for causing actual bodily harm, was sentenced to nine months’ hard labor.

Christopher Nevin was charged with assault on William Churchill, at Taurangn, on November 28, when the latter had left with Mrs Churchill a bag of cabbages, to which proceeding the accused forcibly objected.

The jury found a verdict of guilty on tlie charge of assault, causing actual bodily harm.

The Judge said the accused had denied any improper relations with eomplainant’s wife. No doubt an assault had been committed. No provocation had been established. The accused was a man of integrity and repute. The assault had no doubt been animated by a sense of wrong doing. Accused was not a man of criminal tendencies. He did not intend to send him to prison, but imposed a fine of £25.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19220216.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 16 February 1922, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
287

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 16 February 1922, Page 1

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 16 February 1922, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert