Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANGRY “WETS.”

NEW YORK, March 21

Opponents of prohibition are exhibiting much inrlignntiop over the latest development in the case of an official who on Thursday shot and killed a chauffeur, who, ho alleged, attacked him with a knife while the officer was in the discharge of his duty and attempting to arrest the other man on a charge of illegal trafficking in liquor. It now appears that a v Government agent had been employed as a Prohibition Commissioner under a fictitious name and that in reality he was an ex-convict released two months agi after serving six years in prison an a charge of robbery. The post-mortem examination of the chauffeur, according to the surgeons, indicates that he was shot in the hack and the pistol was held so close as to sear the flesh at the back of the ear No knife was found in the room where the shooting took place. The seriousness with which the authorities regard the case is indicated o' the fact that the agent’s bail has been fixed by the magistrate at £2,000, which has been furnished by a surety companv, although it is customary in such cases where a police or revenue officer is charged with homicide arising out of the discharge of his duty, to release without hail in the custody of a superior officer. Public feeling lias been further inflamed by the statement of Mr James Shcvlin, Prohibition Commissioner for the New York district, who employed the agent. The man gave the name “Stewart McMullin,” and although it had since been admitted this, to oe false he refuses to divulge his real name. Mr Shevlin said, “We will back him to the limit. You can’t have the law enforced by a lot of needle-workers, because there have been numerous .n----stances of prohibition agents being attacked.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19200522.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 22 May 1920, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

ANGRY “WETS.” Hokitika Guardian, 22 May 1920, Page 3

ANGRY “WETS.” Hokitika Guardian, 22 May 1920, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert